3 ms·
Having data on someone doesn’t constitute any kind of damage. So I don’t understand how I benefit from this at all. If my data is hacked, I’m not compensated. I
by fogzen 8y ago
Having data on someone doesn’t constitute any kind of damage. So I don’t understand how I benefit from this at all. If my data is hacked, I’m not compensated. If my data is misused, I’m not compensated. Nothing has really changed to protect me from actual damages resulting from personal data collection. But apparently lots of small businesses and startups are now hurt, and Facebook is in a stronger position to collect PII.
- scottie_m 8y agoHaving data on someone doesn’t constitute any kind of damage. So I don’t understand how I benefit from this at all. You understand, you just disagree and you seem intent on moving the goalposts as needed to make your “GDPR = bad” point.
- acct1771 8y agoEquifax is why them having my data is "bad". Regulation allowing me to delete that is good.
- jimktrains2 8y agoThe gdpr wouldn't have had any affect on the equifax breach. They could have been gdpr compliant and still lost all that data in the same way.
- matthewmacleod 8y agoFacebook now literally has to obliterate your PII when requested. That’s awesome.