3 ms·
It's not scorn for Couple A, but rather for their cheerleaders. There is a real problem with setting an expectation for everyone to have had the financial skil
by Jill_the_Pill 8y ago
It's not scorn for Couple A, but rather for their cheerleaders. There is a real problem with setting an expectation for everyone to have had the financial skills and good luck of Couple A. I think that's more what people mean when they say "that's why there are unions and pensions . . . " -- to give security to large numbers of retirees regardless of their personal situations along the way.
- closeparen 8y ago>"To give security" Missing an /s? The expected value of my Fidelity account is >$0, which is more than I can say for Social Security or public pensions in almost any state.
- eecc 8y agoThank Reagan, Thatcher, Third Way Neoliberals for that...