You missed the point: people manufacture controversy in their heads when scientists say things they don't like. They don't argue against them, they erroneously

You missed the point: people manufacture controversy in their heads when scientists say things they don't like. They don't argue against them, they erroneously think there's not a concensus. While I agree with you in principle that healthy skepticism is good, this is not that. Whether there is a scientific consensus is a fact that people reasonably are not free to be skeptics about.