2 ms·

Did you read the part that says he's the past CEO of Intuit? Not involved with Intuit's current lobbying. In any case attacking the author or Intuit about somet

Did you read the part that says he's the past CEO of Intuit? Not involved with Intuit's current lobbying. In any case attacking the author or Intuit about something that has nothing to do with the topic doesn't make sense.

loceng 9y ago
It makes sense if trying to discredit him/put him down. It seems like an emotional reaction and it makes me wonder if the commenter has vested interest in incentivized crypto-assets like Bitcoin - Pyramid-Ponzi scheme structures. Edit to add: I just realized the original comment might not have been said maliciously, and simply pointing out the ex-CEO was positioning himself well, if he was also part of the lobbying efforts - and if he owns stock still then it could benefit him.
adamnemecek 9y ago
Does he still own stock?
- loceng 9y ago
  How would that make the original comment more or less valid?
  - loceng 9y ago
    Someone's downvoted me for asking a question for clarification? I'm regularly reminded how garbage downvotes are.
mlinksva 9y ago
They've been at it for a long time https://www.warren.senate.gov/files/documents/Tax_Maze_Report.pdf https://www.warren.senate.gov/files/documents/Tax_Maze_Repor...