5 ms·
SHA-0 is another good example. It was withdrawn and replaced with the tweaked SHA-1 for no apparent reason. Years later techniques were discovered that the twea
by mikeash 9y ago
SHA-0 is another good example. It was withdrawn and replaced with the tweaked SHA-1 for no apparent reason. Years later techniques were discovered that the tweak defended against.
DES also defended against a technique that wasn’t developed in the public until two decades later. That technique was originally developed at IBM and NSA merely convinced them to keep it secret, so I’m not sure how that qualifies.
Edit: Schneier has written about these before, of course. I wonder if his point here is not that the NSA was always boring, but rather that its lead is way less impressive than it once was.
- monocasa 9y agoAlso the Diffie-Hellman attack that we only knew about because of Snowden. https://weakdh.org/imperfect-forward-secrecy-ccs15.pdf https://weakdh.org/imperfect-forward-secrecy-ccs15.pdf
- tialaramex 9y agoDid you have a link that somehow relates this to Snowden?
- bangonkeyboard 9y agoSection 4.2 of that selfsame link.
- tialaramex 9y agoThanks, nobody to blame for not seeing that but me.