3 ms·

> Those who weren't going to dope in the first place wouldn't be inclined to anyways. Are you sure about that. I really want to experience drugs like cocaine,

by sumedh 9y ago

> Those who weren't going to dope in the first place wouldn't be inclined to anyways. Are you sure about that. I really want to experience drugs like cocaine, meth etc. The reason I dont do that is because its illegal because if I get caught my life and my family would be ruined, I cant take that risk. If drugs were legal, you bet I would try them and I assume there would be many more people like me.

mrep 9y ago
Please research drugs before you take them. Cocaine is a hell of a lot different than meth from the research I have done.
- sumedh 9y ago
  That is not the point.
shripadk 9y ago
The reason you want to try it is because it's a banned substance. If it wasn't banned in the first place, it wouldn't have been popular enough to get your attention. Curiosity is the primary motivator. There are plenty of psychotropic substances that are similar or more potent than cocaine, meth but you have no idea about it because they aren't as popular or are limited to the labs of a chemist. Unless you know about it, from where would you get the incentive to try it? Banning is the most effective form of advertising. Have you ever seen a banned book or movie flop? Like I said in my previous comment: rebellion varies from individual to individual. You have enough rebellious attitude to contemplate trying inspite of knowing the consequences but are stopping short because of it's legality. There are plenty who are by nature rebellious enough to even disregard the law. The law won't work in such cases. To be honest, legalization would actually make it less interesting. The element of thrill negotiating a deal with the peddler no longer exists when you can just walk up to a storefront and buy one from the counter just like everyone else. There was a story about "legal highs" which you can read here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/6549e0fc-ebd2-4777-9aa2-91a00ebfd629 https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/6549e0fc-ebd2-4777-9a... The idea essentially is that those who want to try will not be deterred from trying in the first place. However, if it was legal the government would have regulation over the quality and quantity of supply. When it's banned there is absolutely no control. That's when it becomes really dangerous. Secondly, have effective regulations instead. For example, in India, you are fined if you are caught smoking in a public space like bus stands, airports or railway stations. This has caused a big dip in the number of people who smoke. DUI laws prevent most from drinking alcohol while driving. People find these regulations reasonable: not completely baby sitting you on what decisions you need to take about your own life and at the same time having regulations to protect others from harm in case you lose your mind.

by sumedh 9y ago

mrep 9y ago

Please research drugs before you take them. Cocaine is a hell of a lot different than meth from the research I have done.

sumedh 9y ago
That is not the point.

shripadk 9y ago

The reason you want to try it is because it's a banned substance. If it wasn't banned in the first place, it wouldn't have been popular enough to get your attention. Curiosity is the primary motivator. There are plenty of psychotropic substances that are similar or more potent than cocaine, meth but you have no idea about it because they aren't as popular or are limited to the labs of a chemist. Unless you know about it, from where would you get the incentive to try it? Banning is the most effective form of advertising. Have you ever seen a banned book or movie flop? Like I said in my previous comment: rebellion varies from individual to individual. You have enough rebellious attitude to contemplate trying inspite of knowing the consequences but are stopping short because of it's legality. There are plenty who are by nature rebellious enough to even disregard the law. The law won't work in such cases. To be honest, legalization would actually make it less interesting. The element of thrill negotiating a deal with the peddler no longer exists when you can just walk up to a storefront and buy one from the counter just like everyone else. There was a story about "legal highs" which you can read here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/6549e0fc-ebd2-4777-9aa2-91a00ebfd629 https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/6549e0fc-ebd2-4777-9a... The idea essentially is that those who want to try will not be deterred from trying in the first place. However, if it was legal the government would have regulation over the quality and quantity of supply. When it's banned there is absolutely no control. That's when it becomes really dangerous. Secondly, have effective regulations instead. For example, in India, you are fined if you are caught smoking in a public space like bus stands, airports or railway stations. This has caused a big dip in the number of people who smoke. DUI laws prevent most from drinking alcohol while driving. People find these regulations reasonable: not completely baby sitting you on what decisions you need to take about your own life and at the same time having regulations to protect others from harm in case you lose your mind.