4 ms·
Computers that support “secure boot” or “verified boot,” such as Chromebooks and Windows laptops with BitLocker, aren’t vulnerable to this. The BIOS can detect
by gerdesj 9y ago
Computers that support “secure boot” or “verified boot,” such as Chromebooks and Windows laptops with BitLocker, aren’t vulnerable to this. The BIOS can detect if the unencrypted part of your disk has been tampered with, and if it has, it will refuse to boot. MacBooks and laptops that run Linux could potentially be attacked in this way.
Really?
(Search terms used: "secure boot linux" and "secure boot macbook")
https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/take-control-your-pc-uefi-secure-boot https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/take-control-your-pc-ue...
https://www.macworld.com/article/3246208/macs/how-apples-startup-security-utility-and-secure-boot-works.html https://www.macworld.com/article/3246208/macs/how-apples-sta...
- indemnity 9y agoMac secure boot is currently only supported on the iMac Pro, not any MacBook as far as I am aware. Rather less likely to be lugging that through customs :)
- agorabinary 9y agoAlso curious about Linux vulnerabilities to this particular attack - any Linux wizards in thread?
- tombrossman 9y agoNot a Linux wizard but as a long time user, I remembered this 2012 news from Canonical: http://blog.canonical.com/2012/06/22/an-update-on-ubuntu-and-secure-boot/ http://blog.canonical.com/2012/06/22/an-update-on-ubuntu-and... Perhaps the author meant there was no 'universal' Linux implementation, however it's been available for a while in certain distros.