4 ms·
The regulation was because the companies were NOT competing in the market for phone chargers through vendor lock in. I don’t know about you but I’m glad I no lo
by hn0 8y ago
The regulation was because the companies were NOT competing in the market for phone chargers through vendor lock in. I don’t know about you but I’m glad I no longer have to keep a box with 30 different chargers anymore. More electronics jumped on the USB charging bandwagon and phone recharging stations are suddenly a thing. Apple somehow seems to have escaped the regulation, sadly.
- klaushougesen1 8y agoApple categorises the iphone as a mini portable compute device - and thereby skirts the whole phone charger thing
- detaro 8y agoApple's charger is compliant since it has an USB-A port and phone side you can use an adapter, which explicitly was allowed in the deal. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_external_power_supply#Reception https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_external_power_supply#R...
- murjinsee 8y agoIn addition to competition, there were also safety issues with proprietary chargers. I personally experienced this, when I had an emergency and my LG Lotus was dead. I tried using a borrowed microUSB charger at the hospital, only to be presented with the message, "Please use an LG-branded charger." The power rating was identical; but, they had some kind of crazy, DRM-like scheme in place. I'm very glad that I can now use or buy a cable anywhere and use pretty much any block, even an inefficient one.