3 ms·
Late reply, sorry, and an old third-hand source: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/oct/28/nick-gillespie/does-emergency-care-account-just-
by repsilat 9y ago
Late reply, sorry, and an old third-hand source: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/oct/28/nick-gillespie/does-emergency-care-account-just-2-percent-all-hea/ http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/oct/...
I figure "it can't hurt, there is a significant market failure, and price transparency can only help."
I'd like to hear someone knowledgeable provide a counterargument, though. Maybe it would be expensive or impossible to enumerate those costs. Maybe preferential ("discriminatory") pricing is really important to the smooth functioning of the system.
- darkerside 9y agoThanks for sharing. Looks like anywhere from 2-10% could be reasonable. Even if it's 2%, that's almost $50B a year. There isn't just one problem in healthcare; we'll need to solve multiple problems. FTR, I think my original post did have several points that pertained to nonemergency care as well.