3 ms·
Multiple people have pointed out the mistakes you are making, to no avail. I really don’t know what else can be said. It’s like you’re claiming 2+2 is 5. What e
by garmaine 9y ago
Multiple people have pointed out the mistakes you are making, to no avail. I really don’t know what else can be said. It’s like you’re claiming 2+2 is 5. What else can I say?
There is ample introductory material on Newtonian physics that you could learn from, only a google search away. It’s disrespectful of my time to assume I must be on the hook to handhold you through it.
- nilkn 9y agoYou will have no trouble then pointing out the precise mistake in the calculation.
- p2t2p 9y agoOk, let me ask a very straight and simple question. Imagine that I have a spacecraft with imaginable engine which is able to indefinitely provide thrust enough for this spacecraft to move straight up from the planet’s surface at the constant speed of 1 mph. Will this spacecraft leave the planet in indefinite amount of time or not? If not - what is going to stop it?
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- zpconn 9y agoI found a number of sources online that disagree with you. https://www.quora.com/Escape-velocity-is-supposed-to-be-24-000-mph-but-our-rockets-never-achieve-this-speed-How-does-that-work?share=1 https://www.quora.com/Escape-velocity-is-supposed-to-be-24-0... Multiple answers explain that there isn't a fixed minimum change in velocity required for an object to escape Earth's gravity. https://www.quora.com/Does-rocket-always-need-the-escape-speed-11-2km-sec-to-escape-the-earth?share=1 https://www.quora.com/Does-rocket-always-need-the-escape-spe... The first answer here explains the same thing, using basically the same example (1 m/s instead of 1 mph). https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/4688/couldnt-i-escape-earths-gravity-traveling-only-1-mph-0-45-m-s https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/4688/couldnt-i-esc... The answers here overwhelmingly reiterate and support the same example in this thread.