4 ms·
Exactly how I read it. Except it wasn't a booby trap. It's like a thief complaining because they crashed the car they stole from you.
by aqme28 9y ago
Exactly how I read it.
Except it wasn't a booby trap. It's like a thief complaining because they crashed the car they stole from you.
- btrettel 9y agoGood example. Another more similar example is if the thief had a food allergy, say peanuts, and they stole a meal containing peanuts and got sick. I don't think most judges would argue that people need to ensure their meals can be eaten by anyone. Though some schools do ban all peanut products for lunch. I am not a lawyer, obviously.
- wgerard 9y ago> It's like a thief complaining because they crashed the car they stole from you. To take this further: It's a bit like they crashed the stolen car because you cut the brake lines in anticipation of someone stealing it (a bit extreme obviously, but just bear with me). Which is interesting: I actually wonder whether you would be found at least civilly liable in that instance.
- aqme28 9y agoNot really. Spiciness isn't at all at the same level as cut brake lines, and it wasn't done in anticipation of anything It's more like you have a manual transmission, and your thief crashed because they only know an automatic.