3 ms·
I wonder if this would also be a use case for foundationdb. All the "clustering" would be built-in and performance seems to be quite good (https://apple.github.
by dividuum 8y ago
I wonder if this would also be a use case for foundationdb. All the "clustering" would be built-in and performance seems to be quite good (https://apple.github.io/foundationdb/performance.html https://apple.github.io/foundationdb/performance.html), although probably not comparable to redis with configuration that accepts data loss. Anyone has experience with that?
- spullara 8y agoI've used it for similar things in the past. Best practice on FDB would be to use snapshot reads on the counters and the add atomic mutation operation so you never have conflicts.
- dividuum 8y agoThanks for your response. Interesting to know that this is indeed possible. foundationdb looks amazing from what I've seen and played with so far.