4 ms·
If you need it, there is also an implementation of CL:LOOP for Racket.
by lispm 9y ago
If you need it, there is also an implementation of CL:LOOP for Racket.
- bjoli 9y agoWhich is rather slow and doesn't add much. Other than awe that someone actually managed to do it :)
- lispm 9y agoMaybe it's not so slow with a better compiler, like the one from Chez Scheme - or is the implementation the problem?
- bjoli 9y agoMost scheme implementations are better at optimizing non-mutating code since it can draw conclusions about types and such easier. Chez probably does a better job than racket because Chez is pretty spectacular :)