I think that's a non-charitable way of reading what I said. Although I was certainly unclear. What I mean is, the interesting issue to me is whether it's OK fo

I think that's a non-charitable way of reading what I said. Although I was certainly unclear. What I mean is, the interesting issue to me is whether it's OK for law enforcement to send a DNA sample and compel ancestry/genomic sites to respond with any matches, even if they do have a warrant. So I misspoke saying it's a technicality, what I really mean is that the issue is interesting to me even if a warrant were provided.