https://www.zdnet.com/article/intel-and-amd-settle-agree-cross-licensing-deal/ https://www.zdnet.com/article/intel-and-amd-settle-agree-cro... https://www.sec.

https://www.zdnet.com/article/intel-and-amd-settle-agree-cross-licensing-deal/ https://www.zdnet.com/article/intel-and-amd-settle-agree-cro... https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/2488/000119312509236705/dex102.htm https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/2488/000119312509236... The first will be a quicker read than the second ;). The other commenter mentioned SMT was an IBM patent rather than an Intel one, so that's probably the answer to my question. It seems weird that they wouldn't have just licensed that from IBM as well.