3 ms·
If this were to come before the CJEU[1], it would not be clear-cut at all. There was a landmark case where home CCTV was ruled inadmissible in a robbery by virt
by donogh 8y ago
If this were to come before the CJEU[1], it would not be clear-cut at all. There was a landmark case where home CCTV was ruled inadmissible in a robbery by virtue of the fact that it included footage of a public road, and the thieves did not consent to the use of their personal data[2], i.e., the recording of their images in public using a home CCTV system.
And the definition of personal data extends to any data that can be linked to you. For example, if a server records a log entry with your name and IP, and the server also records log entries with just the IP, all of the log entries are considered personal data, even for dynamic IPs in some instances[3].
There are some exceptions around criminal justice and the protection of persons and property, however, I still wouldn't be surprised if this DNA evidence were ruled inadmissible in the EU.
[1] Court of Justice of the European Union
[2] http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=160561&doclang=EN http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=160...
[3] https://www.whitecase.com/publications/alert/court-confirms-ip-addresses-are-personal-data-some-cases https://www.whitecase.com/publications/alert/court-confirms-...
- DanBC 8y agoYour second link returns not found for me. Do you have another link? Or a name for me to search, please?
- donogh 8y agoStrange, still works for me! Here's the actual ruling: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=184668&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=1116945 http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&doc...