3 ms·
They only improve speed from an initial "get it working" point of view. That's part of the reason flask is rarely taken seriously as a production solution. Not
by scaryclam 9y ago
They only improve speed from an initial "get it working" point of view. That's part of the reason flask is rarely taken seriously as a production solution. Not having natural separation between views and urls is a real PITA for anyone trying to create a long term solution or larger project. For what it's worth, I also hate the argument that bad design increases Dev speed. That's only true until you need find something later, then you have to hunt around instead of having one place to look, wiping out any initial gains. It's false economy.
- aregsarkissian 9y agoFYI with flask you don't have to use decorators for routing. You have the option to define all your routs in a single file.
- mixmastamyk 9y agoTrue in a very large project, false on the rest. Congrats on your one-true-way argument. ;)
- weberc2 9y agoI'm a professional Python dev, I have no reason to believe that decorators save any time for any size of project. They're harder to reason about for developers of all experience levels and their is no obvious advantage--some argue that the syntax is more pleasant, but I don't perceive an increase in readability; certainly not one that makes up for the increased cognitive burden. The following is super straightforward, testable, and it doesn't depend on globals for shared resources or request state: def hello_handler(r: Request) -> Response: return Response.ok("Hello!") def goodbye_handler(r: Request) -> Response: return Response.ok("Goodbye!") if __name__ == "__main__": router = Router("/") router.register_route("/hello/", "GET", hello_handler) router.register_route("/goodbye/", "GET", goodbye_handler)
- mixmastamyk 9y agoI was thinking more of the fact the are paired with the view. To be honest never gave the fact they are decorators much thought.