A good time to bring up: https://newsroom.intel.com/editorials/moores-law-setting-the-record-straight/ https://newsroom.intel.com/editorials/moores-law-setting-

A good time to bring up: https://newsroom.intel.com/editorials/moores-law-setting-the-record-straight/ https://newsroom.intel.com/editorials/moores-law-setting-the... >Second, in today’s world Moore’s Law can be delivered only by a few companies. Every new process node gets harder and therefore more expensive. [...] >So, no, Moore’s Law is not ending at any time we can see ahead of us. while Moore's original paper: http://www.monolithic3d.com/uploads/6/0/5/5/6055488/gordon_moore_1965_article.pdf http://www.monolithic3d.com/uploads/6/0/5/5/6055488/gordon_m... was always about the trend of putting _more_ components in a chip being more cost effective than keeping the number of components constant. Surely if this were still the case we'd have seen Skylake++++ with cores << n by now.