3 ms·
> It sounds right somehow, so it sticks with us. Because that is the case generally speaking. People become more resistant to change as they get older. They be
by Reedx 9y ago
> It sounds right somehow, so it sticks with us.
Because that is the case generally speaking. People become more resistant to change as they get older. They become more conservative, their openness trait decreases.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16435954 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16435954
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2562318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2562318/
- discreteevent 9y agoThat might be true but it's pretty easy to stay "open" in tech as opposed to being open in general. The longer you do it the more you realise it's all the same and that a good portion of it is actually a regression. That last sentence sounded a bit cynical - So anyway, the main trick with being older in tech is not being open but remaining enthusiastic (most days)
- Reedx 9y agoYep, for sure. And it's easy to be too open in tech - constantly chasing the new shiny framework or language or library (which I'm frequently guilty of). But a lot of times the right answer is to stick with what has been battle tested and what you're productive in.
- modbait 9y agoIndeed. There's an inevitable trade-off between looking for a better approach and simply executing with what you have. (cf machine learning) Suppose my boss asks me to find a good Thai restaurant for lunch. If I'm new to the area, I'll be very "open" and spend a lot of time looking into the possibilities, etc. If I have a lot of experience eating at Thai places in town, I'll be less open. I already know the best one out of a substantial set, and it's less likely that I'll find a better one without a lot of work. Call it stagnation, or call it being careful with the company's money.