3 ms·

> What I don't want is another Facebook clone I think for this time, this is exactly what Google needs to do to kick facebook out of business. Facebook platfor

by Garbage 16y ago

> What I don't want is another Facebook clone I think for this time, this is exactly what Google needs to do to kick facebook out of business. Facebook platform is a proven success. If Google clone it, they will eventually get users. Google have other sources of income. But for facebook, its just "Facebook.com". If "Google" makes the clone and gets users, facebook.com is almost dead then (read like "myspace").

adbge 16y ago
> If Google clone it, they will eventually get users. Why would anyone leave Facebook to join Google's ghost town? Further, Facebook is impossible to successfully clone because part of Facebook's inherent value is that it already has an incredibly large userbase.
- Garbage 16y ago
  > Why would anyone leave Facebook to join Google's ghost town? You don't have to leave Facebook. And most importantly (and highly likely) you don't need to join the ghost town. You are already there if you are using GMail. Don't you know that after using Buzz?
  - doe88 16y ago
    Buzz? what is "Buzz"?
  - riffraff 16y ago
    the question is: why would I _use_ it even if I joined it? I am a buzz user but I never posted anything directly through buzz. Why should I, the number of my friends on facebook is tenfold and does not include people that once mailed me about a typo in my blog.
w1ntermute 16y ago
> If Google clone it, they will eventually get users. That's highly unlikely. Facebook benefits from network effects so strong that Google would have to come up with something revolutionary in terms of social networking to replace Facebook.
nanairo 16y ago
True... though "clone it and eventually users will come" was Microsoft strategy, wasn't it? :D (ah, Microsoft, if you had only patented it! ;P ). But I'd be careful to consider Google vs. Facebook a done deal. Yes, Facebook has only one service... but Google gets all its money from ads, a Facebook could potentially have a much better profile of its users than Google. If Facebook starts chipping at Google's ads de-facto monopoly, it will really hurt Google. It will be a good fight for sure. :)

by Garbage 16y ago

adbge 16y ago

> If Google clone it, they will eventually get users. Why would anyone leave Facebook to join Google's ghost town? Further, Facebook is impossible to successfully clone because part of Facebook's inherent value is that it already has an incredibly large userbase.

Garbage 16y ago
> Why would anyone leave Facebook to join Google's ghost town? You don't have to leave Facebook. And most importantly (and highly likely) you don't need to join the ghost town. You are already there if you are using GMail. Don't you know that after using Buzz?
- doe88 16y ago
  Buzz? what is "Buzz"?
- riffraff 16y ago
  the question is: why would I _use_ it even if I joined it? I am a buzz user but I never posted anything directly through buzz. Why should I, the number of my friends on facebook is tenfold and does not include people that once mailed me about a typo in my blog.

w1ntermute 16y ago

> If Google clone it, they will eventually get users. That's highly unlikely. Facebook benefits from network effects so strong that Google would have to come up with something revolutionary in terms of social networking to replace Facebook.

nanairo 16y ago

True... though "clone it and eventually users will come" was Microsoft strategy, wasn't it? :D (ah, Microsoft, if you had only patented it! ;P ). But I'd be careful to consider Google vs. Facebook a done deal. Yes, Facebook has only one service... but Google gets all its money from ads, a Facebook could potentially have a much better profile of its users than Google. If Facebook starts chipping at Google's ads de-facto monopoly, it will really hurt Google. It will be a good fight for sure. :)