2 ms·
Yes, it is plausible for latencies in the range of >100ms, but not for the ones shown in the article.
by deng 9y ago
Yes, it is plausible for latencies in the range of >100ms, but not for the ones shown in the article.
- ddingus 9y agoYou don't think someone with a pretty rapid response time couldn't tense and relax? They may just do it when the latency varies.
- deng 9y agoYou mean you hit key "a", and while waiting 50ms for it to appear you tense up? No, I don't find that likely.
- ddingus 9y agoFor one key, in isolation, agreed, not likely. However, for a string of them? Yeah, could be a factor. My own trigger was mere awareness. Just knowing it couldbe latent to excess triggered that tensing, like "stay ready." All I'm saying is its plausible. People can, do, will respond very differently to these kinds of things. Worth investigation.
- strong_silent_t 9y agoFor typing I doubt it, ideally you should be able to type fine if the display only updated every 10 seconds. For i.e. the arrow keys, or anything interactive you will probably have to be watching for the response.
- deng 9y agoAgreed. Another example would be gaming with the keyboard - latencies are surely much more noticeable here. I would guess it is similar to music making, where you strive for latencies <10ms.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]