4 ms·
Curated stores are fine and can indeed improve quality, but it'll be a tremendously sad day when they'll be mandated by law. Adding a 30% tax and central contr
by mpartel 8y ago
Curated stores are fine and can indeed improve quality, but it'll be a tremendously sad day when they'll be mandated by law.
Adding a 30% tax and central control on all software just because we believe users can't be taught to not install random crap is a very bleak outlook indeed. Freedom is sometimes messy, but almost always worth it.
- wilsonnb 8y agoI do not support mandating those things by law. I am content with letting the Linux people do their thing while I do my thing. The only people I've only thought wanted to outlaw something are the most extreme Linux/GNU zealots who want to make it illegal for a company to lock down a computer even if it improves the user experience. It stands to reason that such zealots exist on the other side of the argument as well, but I've never encountered them.
- mpartel 8y agoI didn't believe you would, but I fear it's a likely outcome if all that 99% of people ever use is a locked down system. Then misguided (or bribed) lawmakers will almost certainly start getting ideas about banning unlimited computers because "they're only used by hackers and pirates" or "because security" or something.
- CalRobert 8y ago"I am content with letting the Linux people do their thing while I do my thing." The problem is that when it becomes too niche, it will be banned out of course. ("Do you have any idea what people can DO with those things??") Remember, encryption was a munition and controlled accordingly. The need for secure banking is about the only reason we're allowed that. That, and the efforts of people who demand ownership over their machines (or at least something close to it)