4 ms·
I'm not concerned with architectural concerns but usability. The end user, me included doesn't really care if it's Wayland or X underneath, as long as it works
by setquk 9y ago
I'm not concerned with architectural concerns but usability. The end user, me included doesn't really care if it's Wayland or X underneath, as long as it works properly and is productive. Really anything behind the toolkit is of no concern to me.
I'm not going to turn this into a debate on systemd but they managed to win the "Lamest vendor response" prize at the 2017 Pwnies. And clearly you've never been with a system down and got greeted with "Failed to get D-Bus connection: Operation not permitted" and no log entries at all. Yes adding complexity to a risky process was a fantastic idea.
- hart_russell 9y agohttps://media.giphy.com/media/LFlT04CTtrwc/giphy.gif https://media.giphy.com/media/LFlT04CTtrwc/giphy.gif
- gknoy 9y agoI appreciate the "popcorn" feeling, but HN normally strives to avoid responses like this, as they don't add quality to a conversation. This is probably why you are getting downvotes.
- bwat49 9y agoThe user will care when gnome-shell crashes and takes out their entire session, or when their cursor is lagging/skipping. Gnome-shell wayland session still needs a lot of work imo.