>It's not taboo though is it. Very much so. Anyone could be fired for writing what I've written. Diversity is the new state religion. Trump voters knew what t

>It's not taboo though is it. Very much so. Anyone could be fired for writing what I've written. Diversity is the new state religion. Trump voters knew what they were voting for, even if it was dressed up as "economic anxiety" (although low-skilled immigrant workers devaluing labor right before automation is the last thing we need). >which is typically based on outright lies Absolutely not. Pick any metric for latinos in the US and compare them to whites. Fun fact, when you read "immigrants commit less crime than natives" it's due to existing blacks and latinos. They commit more crimes than whites and asians. >which has a hard time dealing with change Does it even register with you that change and immigration can be bad? It's not some force of nature. Again, we literally never voted for our immigration policy to change and it was promised that the ethnic makeup would not be upset in 1965. >Every generation has struggled accepting new groups of people with both good and bad results. So why are you advocating against nature and causing avoidable strife? Diversity is a failed experiment that leads to problems. http://freakonomics.com/2011/12/01/the-violent-legacy-of-africas-arbitrary-borders/ http://freakonomics.com/2011/12/01/the-violent-legacy-of-afr... I noticed that you didn't answer my question. Europe would be better in every meaningful way if there were only Europeans in it. How many thousands of British girls are you fine with being raped in the UK from grooming gangs? How much is enough? Why should a tiny minority in the world (whites) subsidize their own displacement?