I'm trying to read your comment charitably[1], since it's "obviously" wrong (as wrong as if you said, "hard to put this advice into practice since most professi

I'm trying to read your comment charitably[1], since it's "obviously" wrong (as wrong as if you said, "hard to put this advice into practice since most professional programmers have never worked in a company that has any business processes or tools, and it's not really possible to start working in one that does have one") I say this because your parent post is "obviously" a great response that directly answers the question. So, if I want to read your comment charitably: a lot of technical people are poorly in touch with their feelings. Maybe you are right about Liquix, and they poorly report their most rewarding experience. At a guess what would you say is likely more gratifying (the meaning of rewarding) for Liquix? What would a better answer to the question be? I really have trouble guessing why you would write this, unless you thought rewarding meant "highest-paid" (not the usual sense of the word.) [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_charity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_charity