3 ms·
There won't be a substantive discussion about it (at least not by the people who can actively do something about it), because capitalism won't allow it until it
by FranzFerdiNaN 9y ago
There won't be a substantive discussion about it (at least not by the people who can actively do something about it), because capitalism won't allow it until it's too late. Sure, politicians will talk a lot about how we should really, any day now, start reducing our carbon output, but ask them to actually implement strict measures and the silence is deafening.
Then we have corporations, like oil companies, who for many decades suppressed information and actively tried to distort public discussion about climate change. We have politicians who are either in the pocket of corporations or who support an ideology that opposes them even acknowledging the existence of climate change (or denying the role of humans), as that would hurt stock markets and shareholder profits in the short term. And we have consumers (people aren't really citizens anymore, but consumers first and foremost thanks to capitalism) who are bombarded daily with things they should buy to improve their lives, and who thus refuse to give up things like flying or meat or cheap clothes from the other side of the world.
Combine it all and you get the frog that's being slowly boiled (except the frog is smart enough to get out in time).
- DanielBMarkham 9y agoWe may disagree on these things. Reasonable people disagree about things. But it seems we share a desire for substantive discussion. Take a look at my original comment which says that it's time to start talking. Currently it's at -2. Sound public policy-making is preconditioned on people of diverse opinions talking through issues. Nobody gets what they want, but everybody gets something. We reach some sort of local maxima. If the mob rule that currently plagues the internet has their way, this is going to permanently disappear. That's fucked. I remain convinced that people of differing opinions can accomplish great things -- but not in an environment like this. Far too many people are eager to identify the good guys and bad guys (and reward and punish them appropriately) and far too few people are eager to actually listen to one another.