3 ms·
For the same reason you are perfectly fine with government surveillance and prohibition aggressively enforced by the State. Just stop giving your kids money, o
by GyYZTfWBfQw 8y ago
For the same reason you are perfectly fine with government surveillance and prohibition aggressively enforced by the State.
Just stop giving your kids money, or pay more attention to their spending habits. If you think attention to your kid is oppressive surveillance, then there is no hope for you. Apparently children are oppressed by their parents' attention and they are suddenly capable of looking after themselves, yet at the same time you are in favor of prohibition of in-game loot crates because children are not capable of looking after themselves, but you also can't look after them because that would be oppressive. The cognitive dissonance is real.
- bkor 8y agoWhat's the benefit of allowing lootboxes? They're invented by business as a new way of attracting gamblers. Why shouldn't this be regulated or banned? Why is the burden on the general public to try and not be susceptible to gambling? It's pretty proven that various people are. > Apparently children are oppressed by their parents A discussion can be had without words such as "oppressed".
- GyYZTfWBfQw 8y ago> What's the benefit of allowing lootboxes? What's the benefit of X? They're invented by business as a new way of attracting Y. Why shouldn't this be regulated or banned? Feel free to substitute X and Y by virtually anything. > A discussion can be had without words such as "oppressed". Read the comment to what I was replying.