"I'm sorry that this issue leads you to attack me personnally, twice now." So you don't see what you did, repeatedly, as simultaneously offensive and personall

"I'm sorry that this issue leads you to attack me personnally, twice now." So you don't see what you did, repeatedly, as simultaneously offensive and personally attacking literally everyone who holds an opposing view. Yet you clearly understood that what i did was. That's super-interesting. Because what you wrote, twice now, definitely was perceived, as an attack (the only people i can imagine seeing otherwise are those who fervently support your view). Neither of these were different. Even here, instead of saying "hey, i wasn't trying to be offensive, let's step back and try to understand things", you've passively-aggressively "apologized" (IE not a real apology), another form of attacking folks. FWIW: I don't actually have a strong opinion, i'm just opposed to the attacks you've made here, repeatedly. When you approach problems this way, no one is even going to bother to read or listen to what you have to say. (and yes, i understand the irony, the difference, i guess, is that i know i'm doing it, deliberately, in an attempt to get you to see it)