6 ms·
Here are my results (Win7 64b, Core2 Duo 2.4 GHz): Minefield 4 b6 9737.7ms Opera 10.62 14490.8ms Chrome 7.0.517.5 dev 18375.4ms
by bd 16y ago
Here are my results (Win7 64b, Core2 Duo 2.4 GHz):
Minefield 4 b6 9737.7ms
Opera 10.62 14490.8ms
Chrome 7.0.517.5 dev 18375.4ms
Firefox 4 Beta 5 21721.1ms
Safari 5.0 22168.6ms
Firefox 3.6.9 30053.3ms
Explorer 9 PP4 64817.2ms
Though, usual caveat, it's kind of expected that the creator of the benchmark will perform the best (see my older comments on browser benchmarks [1][2]).
What's probably more interesting is the order of other browsers (for which this benchmark should be less tuned) - again Opera performed very well (and better than Chrome).
[1] http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1676456 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1676456
[2] http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1458529 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1458529
- epochwolf 16y agoMy results (OSX 10.6, Core2 Duo 2.4GHz) Safari 5 13939.9ms +/- 1.6% Chrome 6.0.472.55 19155.2ms +/- 1.3% Firefox 3.6.4 23567.1ms +/- 2.8%
- msbarnett 16y agoYeah, on my MacBook Pro (OS X 10.6, Core i5 2.4GHz) I got Safari 5 11018.2ms +/- 0.3% Chrome 6.0.472.55 15342.7ms +/- 1.0% Firefox 3.6.8 18917.6ms +/- 0.1% Interesting (but maybe not surprising) to see that Safari is consistently being reported as faster than Chrome on OS X, but not on Windows.
- sigzero 16y agoMy iMac with Safari 5 was a little more 14ms...