4 ms·
So, to summarize, the person you replied to above asked what is the reasonable alternative to socialized healthcare that does not include people dying in the st
by cycrutchfield 9y ago
So, to summarize, the person you replied to above asked what is the reasonable alternative to socialized healthcare that does not include people dying in the streets of treatable maladies. And through your explanation it appears as though you replied with a tautological statement that had no bearing on the question being asked.
So, what is it that you are actually trying to say?
- creaghpatr 9y agoThey did not ask 'what', they asked 'if' an alternative exists, invoking the classic 'dying in the streets' motif. >Is there a reasonable alternative? I'm not trolling, but letting people die of treatable maladies doesn't seem like the right move. I answered a tautological statement with a tautological question based on the logic the poster omitted. Can you tell me who besides the government or the market (ie consumers) will prevent people from 'dying in the streets'? Perhaps by kidnapping another country's doctors and compelling them to provide care... >I'm not trolling
- darkerside 9y agoI'm a little offended that you'd assume my question to be tautological, by which I in turn assume you mean rhetorical. Seems to have generated some good discussion.