5 ms·
It's true that any internet anti-censorship efforts, even if completely successful, wouldn't have nearly as much real world impact as some armchair enthusiasts
by kevinskii 16y ago
It's true that any internet anti-censorship efforts, even if completely successful, wouldn't have nearly as much real world impact as some armchair enthusiasts like to believe. It’s also true that reality is much more complicated than some “us against them” narrative.
And perhaps to your main point: it’s also not like the Haystack project would have succeeded if only its members had a bit more technical know-how, or if they had just had been willing to open their source, etc. The challenge in thwarting the Islamic Republic’s censorship measures is almost impossibly enormous.
However, this challenge could conceivably be met. Perhaps another Phil Zimmermann might come along one day and revolutionize steganography to bring us a step closer. Unfortunately this becomes less likely with a consummate self-promoter like Austin Heap publicly claiming to have already solved the entire problem.
- tptacek 16y agoPhil Zimmerman failed repeatedly while developing PGP (best example: ADK). Fortunately, PGP wasn't life-or-death for anyone known to have been using it at the time. PGP has now had about as much peer review as most SSL stacks --- and we still find vulnerabilities in SSL stacks. Nobody smart enough to solve this problem would have the hubris to release it to the public on their own.