5 ms·

Is there any professional idea conveyance you can do in person that you can't do over a modest video conference connection?

kevinconaway 9y ago
Videoconferencing introduces friction in to the process. Those meetings must be planned and scheduled. There are no serendipitous hallway or kitchen conversations that flow easily when people are colocated There is also the friction of the software itself. Whiteboarding and freewheeling discussion is possible but it doesn’t have the same feel to it
- majewsky 9y ago
  Also, you can pick up on the body language of people. When I want to discuss something with one of my colleagues, I can glance over at their desk and see if they're focused on something or just staring out of the window, waiting for something to compile. That way I don't have to rip him out of his focus like I would usually have to do with Slack etc.
  - LyndsySimon 9y ago
    I'm remote, and have largely fixed the Slack issue by keeping it silent on my desktop - no notifications. I have a very small set of filters for notification on my iPad, like if someone mentions me by name or certain people DM me. Otherwise, I tab over to Slack when I'm waiting for something else.
- nathan_long 9y ago
  I agree with all your points. But consider the costs of that colocated time. 3 hours out of a worker's day is a lot - they could either do more work (boo) or be less stressed while they work (yay) without that commute. They'd also have fewer sick days (colds don't do TCP). And the flip side of serendipitous conversations is distracting chatter. Which one affects productivity more? Oh yeah, and office space costs a lot. Remote work isn't all roses. But colocation is extremely expensive. The question is whether it's worth it.
  - umanwizard 9y ago
    Yes if everyone were commuting 3 hours then that would tilt the scales toward telecommuting in a big way. But 3 hrs daily commute time is still an outlier, even in the Bay Area. Especially since many major companies have shuttles that allow people to use their commute time productively.

kevinconaway 9y ago

Videoconferencing introduces friction in to the process. Those meetings must be planned and scheduled. There are no serendipitous hallway or kitchen conversations that flow easily when people are colocated There is also the friction of the software itself. Whiteboarding and freewheeling discussion is possible but it doesn’t have the same feel to it

majewsky 9y ago
Also, you can pick up on the body language of people. When I want to discuss something with one of my colleagues, I can glance over at their desk and see if they're focused on something or just staring out of the window, waiting for something to compile. That way I don't have to rip him out of his focus like I would usually have to do with Slack etc.
- LyndsySimon 9y ago
  I'm remote, and have largely fixed the Slack issue by keeping it silent on my desktop - no notifications. I have a very small set of filters for notification on my iPad, like if someone mentions me by name or certain people DM me. Otherwise, I tab over to Slack when I'm waiting for something else.
nathan_long 9y ago
I agree with all your points. But consider the costs of that colocated time. 3 hours out of a worker's day is a lot - they could either do more work (boo) or be less stressed while they work (yay) without that commute. They'd also have fewer sick days (colds don't do TCP). And the flip side of serendipitous conversations is distracting chatter. Which one affects productivity more? Oh yeah, and office space costs a lot. Remote work isn't all roses. But colocation is extremely expensive. The question is whether it's worth it.
- umanwizard 9y ago
  Yes if everyone were commuting 3 hours then that would tilt the scales toward telecommuting in a big way. But 3 hrs daily commute time is still an outlier, even in the Bay Area. Especially since many major companies have shuttles that allow people to use their commute time productively.