13 ms·
Uh, it's the other way around. 10nm Intel is 7nm global foundries. 22nm Intel is superior to 14nm global foundries. Intel is the one that doesn't fudge their n
by tfha 8y ago
Uh, it's the other way around. 10nm Intel is 7nm global foundries. 22nm Intel is superior to 14nm global foundries.
Intel is the one that doesn't fudge their numbers.
- Valmar 8y agoEven Intel's numbers are just marketing, however. Everyone is fudging the numbers... SemiWiki has a good overview of Intel 10nm vs GF 7nm: https://www.semiwiki.com/forum/content/7191-iedm-2017-intel-versus-globalfoundries-leading-edge.html https://www.semiwiki.com/forum/content/7191-iedm-2017-intel-...
- makomk 8y agoFor a while I think it was the other way around: Intel's processes were, in practice, actually substantially less dense than their competitors at the same nominal process node size.
- km3k 8y agoIntel still fudges their numbers. They just fudge their numbers less than everyone else.
- Valmar 8y agoHow so? The numbers don't seem to have much relation at all with all of the real process node numbers.