2 ms·
No, by fatter than normal I mean, say, 96 or 128 bit pointers. I'm aware of SPARC ADI :) It does not have fatter-than-normal pointers, it uses 4 bit tagging of
by DannyBee 9y ago
No, by fatter than normal I mean, say, 96 or 128 bit pointers.
I'm aware of SPARC ADI :)
It does not have fatter-than-normal pointers, it uses 4 bit tagging of the memory address by reusing bits 63-60 of the pointer.
That is "tagging within existing pointers"
- binarycrusader 9y agoAs I said it depends on what you mean by “fatter than normal”.