3 ms·
Even so, that's EXPENSIVE! It rules out a startup I'd say.
by movedx 9y ago
Even so, that's EXPENSIVE! It rules out a startup I'd say.
- freedomben 9y agoI would have agreed prior to the re-licensing to include LGPL, but startups can still jump in and ship a dynamically linked executable. If you truly need/want static linking tho, then you are right the cost is prohibitive.
- pjmlp 9y agoNo, it is actually quite cheap. Usually software licenses for commercial development tools have a few more zeros, or not even that, forcing one to schedule a meeting with their sales people. Before the FOSS movement, startups somehow managed to pay for their software.
- baq 9y agoIt should be peanuts if you have any revenue at all.