Here's a highly relevant quotation from the above linked article. > There has been no permit or other final decision requiring Petitioners to charge visitors $

Here's a highly relevant quotation from the above linked article. > There has been no permit or other final decision requiring Petitioners to charge visitors $2 or any amount for vehicle access, or to advertise any message on its property So Khosla's claims that he is being forced to charge $2 and operate a business are lies. Obviously he looked in to restricting access by charging an exorbitant fee but found that he could charge no more than $2 and only if he applied for a permit that would likely be denied.