Your ability for logical reasoning appears to be flawed. Being down-voted is not proof of your point. The existence of shoddy articles by your opponents is not

Your ability for logical reasoning appears to be flawed. Being down-voted is not proof of your point. The existence of shoddy articles by your opponents is not proof of your point. The existence of bad arguments or bad conduct doesn't prove anything one way or the other. Because for most durably contentious issues, both sides have plenty of crappy advocates. To contextualise using the issue de jour: There are many good pro-Trump arguments and many bad pro-Trump arguments. There are LOTS of good anti-Trump arguments and LOTS of bad anti-Trump arguments. The solution isn't to point to the bad arguments as evidence for the opposite. All you can do is discount and ignore all the bad arguments and isolate your focus on the good arguments.