4 ms·

While I didn't read the paper in detail, there are a lot of papers in the references section about GANs. And referring back to the text that cites them makes i

While I didn't read the paper in detail, there are a lot of papers in the references section about GANs. And referring back to the text that cites them makes it pretty obvious they did use GANs.

p1esk 9y ago
Perhaps you should read the paper in detail before arguing. Eq. 7 makes it pretty obvious there's no discriminator.
- subcosmos 9y ago
  it's just a PUN guys and yes, this is just an acronym