"for the sake of profit" [citation needed] Maybe it was for the sake of actually being a going concern? I see no proof that this was ever sustainable (nor do

"for the sake of profit" [citation needed] Maybe it was for the sake of actually being a going concern? I see no proof that this was ever sustainable (nor do I see proof that it absolutely wasn't, I'm just saying, what are the numbers involved?) Was the model ever solvent? Or did your grandfathers benefit from the money being pumped into the system during their successors' years, successors who would never have that same benefit? That said, the idea that you "don't have a choice" in saving for retirement (that is to say, perhaps a pension program that's less generous) has something going for it. There's a reason NFL players go bankrupt. None of us are particularly good at intuitively understanding future needs and planning for the future.