3 ms·
Palihapitiya and Parker seem to disagree about something important. Parker says that the psychological programming was deliberate: “It’s exactly the kind of th
by leephillips 9y ago
Palihapitiya and Parker seem to disagree about something important. Parker says that the psychological programming was deliberate:
“It’s exactly the kind of thing that a hacker like myself would come up with, because you’re exploiting a vulnerability in human psychology,” he said. “The inventors, creators [...] understood this consciously. And we did it anyway.”
But Palihapitiya says,
“Because your behaviors, you don’t realize it, but you are being programmed. It was unintentional, but now you gotta decide how much you’re willing to give up”.
Does Palihapitiya not realize that the programming he decries was built in to the system deliberately by its designers? Or is Parker wrong?
- wavefunction 9y agoI don't see how their views conflict. Parker is claiming that facebook is intentionally manipulating its users while Palipapitiya is claiming that the users are largely unaware of the manipulation. Their claims are orthogonal and can coexist quite easily.