If a protocol or technology is susceptible to government control or governance, it is by definition centralized. First it was Super Peers, then Trackers, and no

If a protocol or technology is susceptible to government control or governance, it is by definition centralized. First it was Super Peers, then Trackers, and now it's these teams. It's all on the "The Role of Government" [1] page of his slide deck. Let me tackle each one-by-one. * Light-Touch Stewardship * Buyer/Investor Protection Both of these imply a beneficiary/counterparty to go after. No counterparty means any protections or enforcement is impossible below a network-wide ban. * US-Centrality Also implies a beneficiary, if only to gain tax revenue or the splashy effects of innovation. In both cases centralization is a key component. To put another way, BitTorrent does not have a Role of Government section in it's spec. 1: https://www.dropbox.com/s/7koiztv8mae98qg/What%20Are%20Cryptonetworks%20and%20Why%20are%20Tokens%20Fundamental_.pdf?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/7koiztv8mae98qg/What%20Are%20Crypt...