4 ms·
Also important is adapting to the existing naming conventions of the database, even if you don't like it. (Unless the existing naming conventions cause more tro
by daigoba66 8y ago
Also important is adapting to the existing naming conventions of the database, even if you don't like it. (Unless the existing naming conventions cause more trouble that its worth like requiring quoted identifiers or redundant prefixes/suffixes).
- ysleepy 8y agoI agree, consistency is worth a lot more than using a slightly better convention. It would also create surprises in the sense of "principle of least surprise" which is in general a good guideline while designing APIs schemas and so on.
- gwbas1c 8y agoProbably the worst thing I've encountered is a junior engineer trying to encourage me to change a coding style by having two coding styles coexist. I just kept repeating, over and over, that I expected the coding-style to be consistent. It was totally over his head, and he totally didn't even bother looking to find a code formatting utility to do a One-Shot style change.