Actually, I was ridiculing your stance that something being a human construct is somehow an argument against it. Here's a more forthright approach: The problem

Actually, I was ridiculing your stance that something being a human construct is somehow an argument against it. Here's a more forthright approach: The problem with your argument is that it goes about half a level deep and doesn't hold up to even the most elementary criticism. Specifically, I was pointing out that human constructs are a fundamental element of human existence; they are how we negotiate existing alongside one another. So, trying to argue against something solely because it is a human construct makes about as much sense as arguing that somebody is evil because they were born in February.