4 ms·

They didn't use GAN for this.

• gmiller123456 9y ago
  While I didn't read the paper in detail, there are a lot of papers in the references section about GANs. And referring back to the text that cites them makes it pretty obvious they did use GANs.
  • p1esk 9y ago
    Perhaps you should read the paper in detail before arguing. Eq. 7 makes it pretty obvious there's no discriminator.
    • subcosmos 9y ago
      it's just a PUN guys and yes, this is just an acronym