33 ms·

GAN is just a brilliant concept. I look forward to all the new tools to come out of this.

• p1esk 9y ago
  They didn't use GAN for this.
  • gmiller123456 9y ago
    While I didn't read the paper in detail, there are a lot of papers in the references section about GANs. And referring back to the text that cites them makes it pretty obvious they did use GANs.
    • p1esk 9y ago
      Perhaps you should read the paper in detail before arguing. Eq. 7 makes it pretty obvious there's no discriminator.
      • subcosmos 9y ago
        it's just a PUN guys and yes, this is just an acronym