3 ms·
This article and thread gives the impression that it’s dominated by people who don’t even have a rudimentary understanding of ML. If they think SQL is a replace
by ashelmire 9y ago
This article and thread gives the impression that it’s dominated by people who don’t even have a rudimentary understanding of ML. If they think SQL is a replacement for ML, I’m really not sure what they’re doing in this field. ML is for making sense of data in a large number of ways beyond “hey let’s query a database for some trivial information”.
- reacharavindh 9y agoTrue. I don't think the OP or I deny that. The premise is that some practitioners use ML as an overkill for things that are simple enough to be solved by SQL.