5 ms·
the best thing I have done recently is to disable all plugins, including flash: http://imgur.com/mCfqQ.png http://imgur.com/mCfqQ.png YouTube HTML5 support is
by bl4k 16y ago
the best thing I have done recently is to disable all plugins, including flash:
http://imgur.com/mCfqQ.png http://imgur.com/mCfqQ.png
YouTube HTML5 support is good, and for any other video you can directly download. Browser runs a lot faster, web pages load faster, and I don't miss flash ads at all.
I also disabled flash on my parents' computer, and my brothers, and enabled YouTube HTML5 for them. They haven't noticed it yet. It is only a matter of time before more corporate networks uninstall/block all flash, especially with the bad reputation it has with security.
Flash is already dead to me, I can't wait until it is dead for everybody else as well
- aw3c2 16y agoWhy not completely uninstall them instead?
- frou_dh 16y agoIIRC Google helpfully embed Flash inside Chrome
- loumf 16y agoUse the kill-flash extension for Chrome. It takes off flash elements and replaces them with a zone to click on if you want to bring it back. It has a whitelist that you can use for sites that you want flash on by default.
- bl4k 16y agoFlash is still in memory, and those plugins use Javascript to 'hide' the applet
- ciupicri 16y agoIs it to me or the Quicktime plugin is still enabled and it even has a critical security update?
- olalonde 16y agoI had to turn Flash back on after a few minutes after I realized that Google Analytics charts are Flash based :(
- agazso 16y agoUse Flashblock or something similar. By default Flash objects are turned off, but you can click on them to enable. Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/433/ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/433/ Chrome: https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/cdngiadmnkhgemkimkhiilgffbjijcie https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/cdngiadmnkhgemki...
- bl4k 16y agoAs I mentioned below, I had Flashblock, and used it for a while until I noticed that Flash is still in memory and Flashblock is just some JS that hides flash elements. Killing everything is much better.
- bhiggins 16y agoI don't know what Flashblock you were using but the ones I have used do not behave this way. Maybe Flash was in memory because you clicked one of them and allowed it to run?
- bgentry 16y agoI used the following FlashBlock for Chrome, and using resource tracker I could see that no SWFs were downloaded on a YouTube page until after I temporarily enabled Flash on that page. https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/gofhjkjmkpinhpoiabjplobcaignabnl https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/gofhjkjmkpinhpoi... Is that good enough proof that the SWF is not put into memory? Also, the FlashBlockBlock page here does not load when I have the extension enabled: https://woofle.net/flashblockblock/ https://woofle.net/flashblockblock/
- blasdel 16y agoYes, extensions named 'Flashblock' are pretty universally mediocre and don't actually keep Flash from crashing your browser — they just keep it from being displayed. ClickToFlash for native Webkit views on OS X actually blocks Flash for real — it's a native Webkit plugin that registers for Flash's primary mimetype and preempts it. When you selectively enable a flash embed, it replaces itself with Adobe's NPAPI plugin.
- ja27 16y agoI did that for a while but had issues like really needing Flash on a couple sites and the fact that every Flash or PDF update would re-enable their plugins in Chrome. Now instead of disabling individual plugins, now in Chrome I do not allow any site to use plugins, then go back and whitelist sites as needed.