All kinds of splits are happening all the time. People are damn good at grouping everything. What I'm saying neither choices nor immutable traits shouldn't be b

All kinds of splits are happening all the time. People are damn good at grouping everything. What I'm saying neither choices nor immutable traits shouldn't be basis for judgement that are not reasonable and/or not directly related to specific situation. What I was talking about judicial system is the other way. When it looks the other way because of immutable trait it's seen as natural behaviour. Wether it's treating psychos lightly, because it's a condition or looking the other way from certain crimes because of skin color. P.S. Would you say "poor have less money, with all that entails"? I bumped into many people who think shitting on rich is fine, since it's part of the pack. Yet they go completely bananas if I do 180 and say the same about poors :) That's exactly the unreasonable judgement I was talking about.