> The article suggests this is something they already built, tested, and deployed at scale. Because nothing has ever been built by a company that had marginal,

> The article suggests this is something they already built, tested, and deployed at scale. Because nothing has ever been built by a company that had marginal, if any, improvements over what was there before? Not saying that’s the case here, but I’m skeptical of your argument why OP shouldn’t be skeptical, to put it nicely.