2 ms·
So, poor people shouldn't have the option to do this, because if you give them the choice, someday a republican might make it a requirement of welfare? That see
by darawk 9y ago
So, poor people shouldn't have the option to do this, because if you give them the choice, someday a republican might make it a requirement of welfare? That seems like a bit of a silly argument.
- macintux 9y agoWas the point of this discussion to discuss why people may be concerned about unintended consequences or to blithely assert omniscience? Maybe I just picked the wrong thread.
- darawk 9y agoIf all you're saying is that people could theoretically be concerned about that, then sure I agree. I just think the concern is misplaced.